Skip to content

Facebook ad copy generator with a policy pre-check

A rejected ad costs you the review cycle; a pattern of rejections costs you the ad account. This generates several primary-text and headline variants to test, and flags the personal-attribute, health and before/after claims that Meta rejects most often.

Try it now — no signup, no card

Free preview

Paste what you actually know about the product. You get real output and a live pattern-check score in a few seconds.

Or start from an example

What one generation gives you

Counts as 1 of your daily generations
  • Multiple primary text variants
  • Headline and link description options
  • Angle notes for each variant
  • Suggested audience-safe phrasing
  • Compliance score with flagged phrases

The no-signup preview above is real but is not saved. A free account gives you ten daily generations, saved history and a reusable brand profile. Create a free account.

Why this instead of a blank prompt

Variants that differ by angle, not by synonym

You get genuinely different approaches — problem-first, spec-first, objection-handling — so a test tells you something. Rewording the same sentence five ways teaches you nothing.

The rejection patterns, checked up front

Personal-attribute phrasing, implied health outcomes, unrealistic results and sensational language are the categories that get ads disapproved. Each is matched explicitly, with the offending phrase quoted.

Written for the format, inside the truncation point

Primary text front-loads the hook before the "See more" fold, and headlines are kept short enough to display in full on mobile placements.

Three risks this catches, with the fix

These are the patterns that cause the most trouble on this channel. Every one of them reads like normal marketing language, which is exactly why they slip through.

Personal-attribute assertions

Meta prohibits copy that asserts or implies knowledge of a personal characteristic: health condition, financial status, age, race, religion, sexual orientation. The trap is that "Struggling with back pain?" feels like empathy and reads to the classifier as an assertion about the viewer.

Flagged
“Struggling with back pain? This chair will fix you.”
Clean
“An ergonomic chair with 4-way lumbar adjustment and a 10-year frame warranty.”

Before-and-after and unrealistic outcomes

Implied transformation — weight loss, skin clearing, income figures — is restricted whether it is in the image or the text. Specific numeric outcomes attached to a timeframe are the highest-risk version of this.

Flagged
“Lose 10kg in 3 weeks — see the before and after!”
Clean
“15g of protein and 4g of fibre per serving, in four flavours.”

Sensational or misleading urgency

All-caps shouting, "shocking", fake countdowns and engagement bait ("comment YES") reduce delivery even when the ad is approved, and repeated use puts the account at risk.

Flagged
“SHOCKING! Doctors HATE this! Comment YES for the link!!”
Clean
“A 2200W kettle that boils two cups in 90 seconds. Free UK delivery.”

The compliance engine runs against documented marketplace and advertising policies, and flags the known failure patterns before you publish — with the exact phrase and the rule that triggered each flag.

Compared with the alternatives

Three honest ways to get this written. We are comparing approaches rather than naming competitors, because a general-purpose chatbot is not trying to do this job and it would be unfair to score it as if it were.

CopyForge AI compared with a general AI chatbot and writing by hand
CapabilityCopyForge AIGeneral AI chatbotWriting it by hand
Grounded in facts you supplyRequired — the prompt is built from your input and nothing elseOptional, and the model fills gaps with plausible inventionYes, if you are disciplined
Policy check before publishingApplicable checks from the 18-rule documented library, with the exact phrase flaggedNone, unless you know to ask — and then it grades its own workOnly what you remember to check
Time for one ad setUnder a minuteA few minutes plus prompt fiddling30–90 minutes
Consistent brand voice and banned wordsBrand profiles apply approved claims and forbidden words every runRe-paste your guidelines every single timeDepends who wrote it
Doing a whole catalogueBulk CSV on paid plans, exported as a ZIPOne at a time, by handWeeks
CostFree for 10 a day; Pro is $19/mo for 2,000 per 30-day window$0–20/mo, plus your time on prompts and checkingYour hourly rate, or a copywriter’s

Questions

No — and treat any tool claiming otherwise as a red flag. Meta’s review combines automated classifiers with human reviewers and the outcome depends on your image, landing page, account history and category as much as the text. This removes the well-documented text-level causes of rejection, which is the part you control.

Both. They share an ad system and a policy set, so the same primary text, headline and description apply across Facebook and Instagram placements.

Several distinct angles per generation, each with its own headline. One generation is one product for one channel, so you are not spending five credits to get five variants.

The copy transfers, but the compliance rules here are tuned to Meta’s policies plus FTC substantiation guidance. Google and TikTok overlap heavily on health, financial and personal-attribute claims, so the flags remain useful — just do not treat a clean score as clearance under a different platform’s rules.

More free tools

Generate, check and tighten your copy in one place. Every tool is free to use — no card, and the checkers never consume a generation.

Try it on a product you are actually selling

10 generations a day on the free plan, with the full compliance report. No card, no trial countdown, and no automatic paid conversion.

Try a free preview