Skip to content

Email copy generator that keeps the subject line honest

Email is the one channel where a deceptive subject line is specifically illegal in the US, and where a missing unsubscribe link is a regulator’s problem rather than a platform’s. This writes subject lines and body copy that match, and flags the parts that would not survive scrutiny.

Try it now — no signup, no card

Free preview

Paste what you actually know about the product. You get real output and a live pattern-check score in a few seconds.

Or start from an example

What one generation gives you

Counts as 1 of your daily generations
  • Several subject line options
  • Preview text that extends the subject
  • Body copy with a single clear call to action
  • Plain-text version
  • Compliance score with flagged phrases

The no-signup preview above is real but is not saved. A free account gives you ten daily generations, saved history and a reusable brand profile. Create a free account.

Why this instead of a blank prompt

Subject and body that describe the same email

Subject lines are generated from the body, not bolted on. A subject that promises a discount the email does not contain is the specific thing CAN-SPAM calls deceptive, and it is the fastest way to train people to ignore you.

Preview text used as real estate

Most senders leave the preheader to be auto-filled with "View in browser". You get preview text written to extend the subject line instead of repeating it.

Compliance obligations you cannot generate away

The output reminds you what copy cannot solve: a valid physical postal address, a working opt-out process, accurate sender details, and the consent or other lawful basis required in each recipient’s jurisdiction. Those are sender obligations, not copy choices.

Three risks this catches, with the fix

These are the patterns that cause the most trouble on this channel. Every one of them reads like normal marketing language, which is exactly why they slip through.

Subject lines that misrepresent the content

Under CAN-SPAM a materially misleading subject line is a per-email violation. "Re:" and "Fwd:" on a message that is neither, or a discount in the subject that is not in the email, are the textbook examples.

Flagged
“Re: your order — 70% off inside!”
Clean
“The 1.7L kettle is back in stock”

Unsubstantiated claims that live forever in an inbox

Email is archived and forwarded. A health or earnings claim that would be flagged on a listing is more durable here, because the recipient still has it a year later when they want a refund.

Flagged
“Our customers typically double their revenue in 30 days”
Clean
“Read how one seller restructured their listings — with their numbers, shared with permission”

Pressure tactics and manufactured deadlines

Fake expiry dates and "last chance" messages sent weekly are deceptive practices, and they measurably increase spam complaints — which damages the sender reputation that determines whether your next email lands at all.

Flagged
“FINAL WARNING: your cart expires in 60 minutes!”
Clean
“Your basket is saved. The kettle is in stock if you still want it.”

The compliance engine runs against documented marketplace and advertising policies, and flags the known failure patterns before you publish — with the exact phrase and the rule that triggered each flag.

Compared with the alternatives

Three honest ways to get this written. We are comparing approaches rather than naming competitors, because a general-purpose chatbot is not trying to do this job and it would be unfair to score it as if it were.

CopyForge AI compared with a general AI chatbot and writing by hand
CapabilityCopyForge AIGeneral AI chatbotWriting it by hand
Grounded in facts you supplyRequired — the prompt is built from your input and nothing elseOptional, and the model fills gaps with plausible inventionYes, if you are disciplined
Policy check before publishingApplicable checks from the 18-rule documented library, with the exact phrase flaggedNone, unless you know to ask — and then it grades its own workOnly what you remember to check
Time for one emailUnder a minuteA few minutes plus prompt fiddling30–90 minutes
Consistent brand voice and banned wordsBrand profiles apply approved claims and forbidden words every runRe-paste your guidelines every single timeDepends who wrote it
Doing a whole catalogueBulk CSV on paid plans, exported as a ZIPOne at a time, by handWeeks
CostFree for 10 a day; Pro is $19/mo for 2,000 per 30-day window$0–20/mo, plus your time on prompts and checkingYour hourly rate, or a copywriter’s

Questions

No. It writes the copy; you paste it into Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Shopify Email or whatever you already use. There is no list to import and no sending permission to grant, which also means nothing here touches your subscriber data.

No. The scan checks the copy — deceptive subject lines, unsubstantiated claims, false urgency. It cannot verify the things that actually make a send lawful: that your list opted in, that your unsubscribe link works, and that your physical postal address is present and real. Those are on you, and the output says so.

One generation covers one email. Run it once per email in the sequence with the specific facts and intent for that step; bulk CSV on a paid plan makes an entire flow a single upload.

Both govern consent and data handling rather than wording, so no copy tool can make you compliant with them. What the scan does cover is the wording side — misleading subjects and claims you cannot evidence — which is where the copy itself creates exposure.

More free tools

Generate, check and tighten your copy in one place. Every tool is free to use — no card, and the checkers never consume a generation.

Try it on a product you are actually selling

10 generations a day on the free plan, with the full compliance report. No card, no trial countdown, and no automatic paid conversion.

Try a free preview